NDA Q&A: Dmitry Sverdlik, CEO and Founder at Xenoss on optimizing AdTech

As companies learn to adapt to an uncertain global economy, how can AdTech companies implement more cost-efficient solutions?

For AdTech companies, technology-related expenses are considered integral to their unit economics: they impact the cost of providing services or selling products on a per-customer level. Taking a broader perspective, technology spend influences the profitability of such businesses. The higher the technology bill, the less profit the company can make as it scales, to the point of bringing it under if the business doesn’t keep these expenses costs well under control. 


Based on the results of Xenoss’s projects, I can say that AdTech businesses can cut operating costs by first optimizing their infrastructure rather than resorting to extreme measures like budget cuts and staff layoffs. We have seen many examples. For instance, a company that struggled with skyrocketing AWS costs of maintaining its custom demand-side platform (DSP) reached out to us for help. During the first year since the launch, they had spent up to $500,000; four years later, the bill had grown five-fold. Overall, the client’s five-year tech spending topped $6 million. Our team evaluated whether the solution’s infrastructure matched its requirements (it didn’t) and optimized a tech stack and architecture to make a platform cost-efficient and scalable. Eventually, we brought annual costs down from $2.5 m to $144,000.


So what sort of changes can/should Ad Tech companies make to their infrastructure to reduce their operating costs?

AdTech companies should set up a thorough technical audit of their cloud infrastructure. The first thing to do is reconsider the business’s dependency on managed cloud services. Companies that delegate the management of cloud-based resources and services won’t be able to optimize or configure data infrastructure to ensure the product keeps up with the increasing workload. They buy into the ecosystem that upcharges them as they scale and miss the opportunity to extend their in-house expertise and increase the flexibility of their platform. So my advice is to start managing one’s own infrastructure and replace managed cloud services with self-service ones.


When you pay per request to a database with services like Amazon RDS or Google BigQuery, these cents add up significantly as your business scales. Switching from cloud services that bill on a per-query basis is another way to cut expenses on infrastructure. In our projects, we mainly use ClickHouse or Aerospike.


AdTech companies can also re-engineer architecture to ensure the system works efficiently in real-time while consuming less CPU and memory. I’m talking about replacements in the tech stack and the data model. For example, Xenoss specialists changed a back-end codebase from Node.js to Java and substituted MongoBD with Aerospike in the DSP I mentioned before. On top of that, they implemented K-D indexing for scalable in-memory search.


Finally, reorganizing data pipelines to eliminate any redundancies in data transfer and access can also help reduce costs.


Are there any common mistakes you see ad tech companies making when building and growing their business? Can they be avoided?

There are plenty of common mistakes, but the most serious is assuming that adopting managed cloud services is more financially profitable in the long run than hiring developers experienced in building, maintaining and optimizing high-load applications. Another bias, the free money trap as we call it, is about ignoring the system’s computing resource consumption and infrastructure costs while using free cloud credits. Those taking cloud credits as a gift and not monitoring and estimating current and future spending may not handle bills when credits expire.


Of course, you can avoid these mistakes by growing in-house engineering talent and selecting optimal tech stack and architecture with flexible optimization options from the outset. But it’s never too late to turn things around. In fact, given the current economic uncertainties the industry faces, I’d say now is the perfect time.


How to choose the right infrastructure and tech stack?

Factor into the equation your budget, the amount of data you expect your solution to process, DevOps expertise, and your performance requirements. You’ll need to upload huge chunks of data, tweak indexes and compression, and see how the application operates. It’s only possible to make the best architectural decisions by experimenting. 


If your internal team needs an outside opinion, you can rely on a tech partner to pick the most suitable technologies for your solution’s requirements. A tech partner can complement in-house engineering talent or overtake development if needed. Regardless of the scenario, the team will gain more knowledge in engineering high-load systems, and the business will get a scalable AdTech solution that won’t squeeze your margins with infrastructure costs.


Also published in: New Digital Age




More from our team & client partners

Fake it till you make it? Thought leadership’s got trust issues
September 15, 2026
It has never been easier to publish something polished, yet it is becoming harder to prove that the thinking behind it is genuinely yours.
The Credibility Premium: Why AI has just made riding solo impossibly expensive
August 14, 2026
For the last twenty years or so, brands have been rightly obsessed with their search rankings. But in the time it takes for consumers to completely reinvent their online research habits – which it turns out wasn’t very long at all – it has become clear SEO was the easy part.
Creator marketing: The growth engine brands can no longer afford to ignore
August 13, 2026
There was a time when creator partnerships were considered a ‘nice-to-have’ in supporting a marketing campaign. They were great for achieving an extra few likes and comments across social platforms, but rarely were creators considered central to an ad campaign, never mind a long-term growth engine.
Rob Hall, CEO of Parallel: “Digital Twins and ‘Customer Suitability’ can power better decisions
August 12, 2026
While brand safety and brand suitability help advertisers avoid harmful environments and align campaigns with brand values, Customer Suitability asks whether a video placement is right for the customer viewing it. Parallel combines proprietary AI, large-scale data sets and digital twins – synthetic replicas of consumer
Andy Squire, Brave Ads: “AI replacing traditional Search? It’s not as simple as that”
August 10, 2026
NDA spoke recently with Andy Squire, RVP Sales EMEA at Brave Ads, about the rapid evolution of the Search marketplace and how marketers can reassess their strategy for discoverability…
Brandtech’s Jellyfish Launches AI Ads Optimisation in Share of Model™
By Ren Bowman August 6, 2026
Jellyfish, a global digital marketing leader within The Brandtech Group, today announced AI Ads Optimisation, a major expansion of the paid media optimisation capabilities within its proprietary Share of Model™ Platform. The update extends beyond the existing Google Ads integration for Performance Max to generate media
Tinder ‘Dump Traditional Dating’: Alternative fourplay | The Digital Voice™
By Ren Bowman August 6, 2026
Oh the joys of online dating…are there any? Not according to many of those we know but maybe, just maybe Tinder has the answer, with its Double Date feature.
How adtech CEOs should use LinkedIn in 2026: a visibility playbook for the AI world
July 25, 2026
Everyone knows that CEOs should be using LinkedIn. But so often it’s something they promise they’ll get around to after the board meeting, after the investor update, product launch, client pitch, or one of a hundred other urgent tasks competing for attention. It's time to stop treating LinkedIn as a nice to have.
Stop the scroll: how to win at SEO in the age of AI search | The Digital Voice™
May 14, 2026
How people seek and find information, optimising for the front page of search engines is no longer optimal. GEO has made technical SEO more important than ever.
Show More